[~00%]
[HEADLINE FINDING]
[How this was measured, and over what period.]
[PROJECT TYPE] · [YEAR]
[PROJECT NAME]
[ONE-LINE PROJECT TYPE / ROLE TAG — e.g. End-to-end service design and mixed-methods research for a national EV charging network.]
Objective
What this project set out to do
[OBJECTIVE — one or two sentences, no more. State the goal in plain language, not deliverables. Resist adding context here; that belongs in Challenges.]
Challenges
What made this hard
[FRAMING — two or three sentences of context. If the challenges are not genuinely distinct, delete the tile row below and keep this section text-only.]
Approach
How the work was structured
[APPROACH — describe the shape of the engagement: phases, who was involved, what decisions each phase fed. Keep the detail of individual methods for the Methodology section.]
Methodology
Methods, and why each one
[METHODOLOGY — lead with the reasoning: what question each method was chosen to answer, sample sizes, and any limitations you would name in a viva. Only keep the tile row below if the methods are genuinely distinct; otherwise delete it and let this paragraph carry the section.]
Solutions & Findings
What we found, and what we built from it
[FRAMING — one short paragraph. Let the tiles below carry the detail; this paragraph only needs to set up how to read them.]
Recommendations
What was recommended, and what shipped
[RECOMMENDATIONS — be specific about what you proposed, what was implemented, and what was not. Naming what did not ship, and why, reads as more credible than a list of wins. Delete the before/after row below if you have no comparable visuals.]
Impact
What changed as a result
[~25%]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
Outcomes
Where it landed
[OUTCOMES — a short summary of the end state. Where Impact is numbers, this is the narrative: what exists now that did not before, who owns it, and what happened after handover.]
Reflections
What I would do differently
[REFLECTIONS — first person, and specific. Name the decision you are least sure about and what you would test instead. This section is more convincing when it is not flattering.]
Learnings
What transfers to the next project
[LEARNINGS — what you would carry into unrelated work. Keep these portable; a learning that only applies to this client is really an outcome.]
[LEARNING 01 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[LEARNING 02 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[LEARNING 03 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[PROJECT TYPE] · [YEAR]
[PROJECT NAME]
[ONE-LINE PROJECT TYPE / ROLE TAG — e.g. End-to-end service design and mixed-methods research for a national EV charging network.]
Objective
What this project set out to do
[OBJECTIVE — one or two sentences, no more. State the goal in plain language, not deliverables. Resist adding context here; that belongs in Challenges.]
Challenges
What made this hard
[FRAMING — two or three sentences of context. If the challenges are not genuinely distinct, delete the tile row below and keep this section text-only.]
Approach
How the work was structured
[APPROACH — describe the shape of the engagement: phases, who was involved, what decisions each phase fed. Keep the detail of individual methods for the Methodology section.]
Methodology
Methods, and why each one
[METHODOLOGY — lead with the reasoning: what question each method was chosen to answer, sample sizes, and any limitations you would name in a viva. Only keep the tile row below if the methods are genuinely distinct; otherwise delete it and let this paragraph carry the section.]
Solutions & Findings
What we found, and what we built from it
[FRAMING — one short paragraph. Let the tiles below carry the detail; this paragraph only needs to set up how to read them.]
[~00%]
[HEADLINE FINDING]
[How this was measured, and over what period.]
Recommendations
What was recommended, and what shipped
[RECOMMENDATIONS — be specific about what you proposed, what was implemented, and what was not. Naming what did not ship, and why, reads as more credible than a list of wins. Delete the before/after row below if you have no comparable visuals.]
Impact
What changed as a result
[~25%]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
Outcomes
Where it landed
[OUTCOMES — a short summary of the end state. Where Impact is numbers, this is the narrative: what exists now that did not before, who owns it, and what happened after handover.]
Reflections
What I would do differently
[REFLECTIONS — first person, and specific. Name the decision you are least sure about and what you would test instead. This section is more convincing when it is not flattering.]
Learnings
What transfers to the next project
[LEARNINGS — what you would carry into unrelated work. Keep these portable; a learning that only applies to this client is really an outcome.]
[LEARNING 01 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[LEARNING 02 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[LEARNING 03 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[PROJECT TYPE] · [YEAR]
[PROJECT NAME]
[ONE-LINE PROJECT TYPE / ROLE TAG — e.g. End-to-end service design and mixed-methods research for a national EV charging network.]
Objective
What this project set out to do
[OBJECTIVE — one or two sentences, no more. State the goal in plain language, not deliverables. Resist adding context here; that belongs in Challenges.]
Challenges
What made this hard
[FRAMING — two or three sentences of context. If the challenges are not genuinely distinct, delete the tile row below and keep this section text-only.]
Approach
How the work was structured
[APPROACH — describe the shape of the engagement: phases, who was involved, what decisions each phase fed. Keep the detail of individual methods for the Methodology section.]
Methodology
Methods, and why each one
[METHODOLOGY — lead with the reasoning: what question each method was chosen to answer, sample sizes, and any limitations you would name in a viva. Only keep the tile row below if the methods are genuinely distinct; otherwise delete it and let this paragraph carry the section.]
Solutions & Findings
What we found, and what we built from it
[FRAMING — one short paragraph. Let the tiles below carry the detail; this paragraph only needs to set up how to read them.]
[~00%]
[HEADLINE FINDING]
[How this was measured, and over what period.]
Recommendations
What was recommended, and what shipped
[RECOMMENDATIONS — be specific about what you proposed, what was implemented, and what was not. Naming what did not ship, and why, reads as more credible than a list of wins. Delete the before/after row below if you have no comparable visuals.]
Impact
What changed as a result
[~25%]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
[00]
[WHAT IT MEASURES]
[Source and period.]
Outcomes
Where it landed
[OUTCOMES — a short summary of the end state. Where Impact is numbers, this is the narrative: what exists now that did not before, who owns it, and what happened after handover.]
Reflections
What I would do differently
[REFLECTIONS — first person, and specific. Name the decision you are least sure about and what you would test instead. This section is more convincing when it is not flattering.]
Learnings
What transfers to the next project
[LEARNINGS — what you would carry into unrelated work. Keep these portable; a learning that only applies to this client is really an outcome.]
[LEARNING 01 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[LEARNING 02 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]
[LEARNING 03 — stated so it would still make sense to a stranger.]